So before anything else, it’s important to have some sort of
standard definition to refer to whenever we use the term “heavy tank”. With the
lack of very many modern heavy tanks (most modern tanks are Battle Tanks, we’ll
get to that later), we’ll have to develop our general case based on
observations of World War II designs, where heavy tanks saw the most use. So,
what does this give us?
Well,
going by the design principals of the US, Germany, and the USSR, most heavy
tanks had the following in common: First and foremost, heavy tanks had much
thicker armor than their lighter counterparts. In WWII this could be as little
as 50 millimeters thicker armor to armor that was 75 than 100 millimeters
thicker than that of lighter tanks.
German heavy tanks like this Tiger II had nearly seven inches of armor plating at points
This contributes heavily to the second
major commonality – the role of these vehicles on the battlefield. While light
and medium tanks were often used to fulfil tactical objectives (hunting enemy
tanks, raiding supply convoys, routing small infantry units, and the like),
strategic objectives were fulfilled by massing heavy tanks at a point, and then
telling them to stay put or advance depending on their objective. Their armor
was often thick enough that they could take multitudes of shots, even from
other tanks, before even suffering drops in performance. This meant that a
squad of heavy tanks was more than capable of holding a position more than long
enough for reinforcements to show up, or could easily be used to spearhead and
attack on an enemy and almost immediately split their ranks.
The third major
commonality was in the armament – heavy tanks always had the biggest and best
cannons available at the time. This went doubly true for the USSR who routinely
mounted 75 millimeter, 105 millimeter, 122 millimeter, and 152 millimeter
cannons on their tanks, especially their heavier tanks - the KV-2 in the background is an excellent example, sporting a 152mm howitzer for a main cannon.
The fourth major commonality
was their painfully low speed. With all their arms and armament, that didn’t
leave much room for an engine, so heavy tanks tended to be considerably slower
than their counterparts. In summation, our definition of a heavy tanks is lots
of armor, big guns, strategic application, and low speeds. So now that we know
what a heavy tank is, we can define what it isn’t.

No comments:
Post a Comment